Tuesday, 2 February 2010

Themes so far: comparative histories of utopia.

OK - here is a brief summary of some of the formal ways of thinking comparatively about the history of ideas that we have encountered so far. I know this is a bit dry - more on Utopias later - meanwhile go off and watch the BBC on Virtual utopias (see below) or read the NYT on mind/body and place/time (see above)- which are both more fun.

Thinking Comparatively (History of Ideas)
In addition to diachronic, synchronic and anachronistic - in relation to More we came across the following differnet ways of trying to think about the ideas in utopia historically.

Skinner and the Cambridge school: linguistic synchronic contextualism (see Goldie on this) - can only analyse key terms in relation to contemporary debates and usages demonstrably known to the author

Davis et al: historical synchronic contextualism - explanation through location in contemporary events influencing the author as perceived by the historian looking backwards.

Surtz et al - the longue duree, diachronic influence of Plato et al, and above all the historian perceives influences based on apparent similarities.

Kenyon - builds on Cambridge school's approach but also critical of it for underestimating the ability of the author to make an original, new contribution

Goldie - goes even further: we should not divorce an author's philosophy (however inventive) from the same author's moral seriousness (intention and capacity to act as well as think ethically). ie that pre-modern utopias were written within a framework of moral intentions for their application in the world, that agnosticism and relativism comes later (after Bentham and Kant).

Morris (and many others) looking backward sees in More a socialist 'before his time'. wirites NfN partly in direct response to that anachronistic reading?

Coming soon .... Jameson and the generic window.










 And here is the rest of it.

No comments: